(III-1) Economic Relations of 9 Asiancountries
with Japan, United States and EU
( Unit : 100 million U.S. dollar) |
Japan |
United States |
EU 15 |
World ( 100%) |
|||||||
Euro 11 |
||||||||||
Share |
Share |
Share |
Share |
|||||||
Trade (1997) |
3,045 |
16% |
3,347 |
17% |
2,664 |
14% |
2,016 |
10% |
19,481 |
|
Direct Inward Investment (1997) |
163 |
14% |
162 |
14% |
240 |
20% |
n.a. |
n.a. |
1,185 |
|
Outstanding Claims (End-Jun.1998) |
1,825 |
30% |
292 |
5% |
3,046 |
50% |
2,239 |
37% |
6,071 |
|
Bilateral Aid (1996) |
47 |
69% |
1 |
2% |
16 |
24% |
14 |
21% |
68 |
(Note 1) | "9 Asian counties" refer to ASEAN4?Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia ,and Philippines), NIES and China. |
(Note 2) | "Direct Inward Investment" excludes the direct inward investment into Hong Kong SAR. In case of direct inward investment into Thailand by several countries,those countries are double-counted. "EU 15" in Direct Inward Investment into Taiwan and Thailand refers to the following respectively: Taiwan: United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Netherlands Thailand: United Kingdom, Germany, France, Belgium, Italy, and Netherlands |
(Note 3) | "Outstanding Claims" refer to the outstandinfg claims of the world (or respective countries and regions) on 9 Asian countries. "Bilateral Aid" refers to the aid to 9 Asian Countries from the world (or respective countries and regions). |
(Note 4) | Neither EU 15 nor Euro 11 in "Outstanding Claims" includes Denmark, Ireland, Sweden, Portugal, and Greece. |
(Note 5) | "World" in "Bilateral Aid" refers to all DAC countries. |
(Sources) | International Monetary Fund, "Direction of Trade Statistics", Bank for International Settlements, "International Banking and Financial Market Developments November 1998", Organization for Economic Co-operation, "Geogra,phical Distribution of Financial Flow to Aid Recipients", etc. |
(III-1-(1)) Share of Intra-ASEANTrade
Exports |
(million U.S. dollar) |
1967 (ASEAN5) |
1982 (ASEAN6) |
1992 (ASEAN6) |
1997 (ASEAN9) |
Intra-EU |
Intra-NAFTA |
|
Total |
3,477 (100.0%) |
70,900 (100.0%) |
182,948 (100.0%) |
356,561 (100.0%) |
2,094,100 (100.0%) |
1,010,660 (100.0%) |
Intra-ASEAN |
239 (6.9%) |
16,989 (24.0%) |
40,985 (22.4%) |
84,727 (23.8%) |
1,179,700 (56.3%) |
496,423 (49.1%) |
To Korea and |
166 (4.8%) |
4,430 (6.2%) |
15,135 (8.3%) |
34,342 (9.6%) |
||
To China |
47 (1.3%) |
776 (1.1%) |
3,786 (2.1%) |
10,683 (3.0%) |
||
To Japan |
936 (26.9%) |
20,568 (29.0%) |
29,651 (16.2%) |
47,925 (13.4%) |
||
To East Asia |
1,388 (39.9%) |
42,762 (60.3%) |
89,557 (49.0%) |
177,677 (49.8%) |
Imports |
(million U.S. dollar) |
1967 |
1982 |
1992 |
1997 |
Intra-EU |
Intra-NAFTA |
|
Total |
4,190 |
72,111 |
179,992 |
360,960 |
1,873,340 |
1,154,750 |
Intra-ASEAN |
239 |
16,989 |
40,985 |
84,727 |
1,179,700 |
496,423 |
From Korea and |
259 |
3,868 |
15,473 |
32,653 |
||
From China |
70 |
1,284 |
4,260 |
11,492 |
||
From Japan |
1,107 |
14,950 |
40,754 |
68,647 |
||
To East Asia |
1,366 |
37,091 |
101,472 |
197,519 |
(Note 1) | Calculated from export data for each country (or region). |
(Note 2) | Members of ASEAN are as follows. |
|
|
(Note 3) | Figures in parentheses are shares in "Total". |
(Source) | International Monetary Fund, "Direction of Trade Statistics" |
(III-1-(2)) Relative Economic Size :Asia, the Americas and Europe
Share of world nominal GDP |
Share of world trade |
Share of world population |
Current Account Balance (1997) |
Outstanding of Net External Assets |
Outstanding of Public Bonds |
Market Capitalisation in Equity Market |
||||
1997 |
1997 |
Estimate for 1996(world=100) |
Ratio to |
(billion U.S. dollar9 |
End-1996 (billion U.S. dollar) |
End-Sep. 1998 (billion U.S. dollar) |
End-1997 (billion U.S. dollar) |
|||
Asia (Japan + 9 Aisian countries) |
22 |
24 |
31 |
1.9 |
127 |
- |
- |
- |
||
Japan |
14 |
7 |
2 |
2.2 |
94 |
891 |
3,118 |
2,217 |
||
9 Aisian countries |
8 |
18 |
29 |
1.3 |
32 |
- |
- |
- |
||
The Americas |
35 |
24 |
13 |
- 2.1 |
- 230 |
- |
- |
- |
||
United States |
26 |
14 |
5 |
- 1.9 |
- 155 |
- 744 |
7,550 |
11,309 |
||
Canada |
2 |
4 |
1 |
- 1.5 |
- 9 |
- 242 |
398 |
568 |
||
Central and South America |
7 |
6 |
8 |
- 3.3 |
- 65 |
- |
- |
- |
||
Europe |
28 |
39 |
9 |
1.2 |
105 |
- |
- |
- |
||
EU 15 |
27 |
36 |
7 |
1.5 |
123 |
- 466 |
4,623 |
5,236 |
||
Euro 11 |
21 |
29 |
5 |
1.8 |
112 |
- 316 |
3,814 |
2,874 |
||
Central and |
1 |
2 |
2 |
- 5.0 |
- 18 |
- |
- |
- |
(Note 1) | "9 Asian countries" refer to ASEAN4 ( Tahiland, Indoneisia, Malaysia, and Philippines), NIES, and China. | |
(Note 2) | For "Outstanding of External Net Assets", EU 15 and Euro 11exclude Ireland and Greece. | |
(Note 3) | For "Market Capitalisation in Equity Market", EU 15 and Euro 11 exclude Portugal, Greece, and Luxembourg. | |
(Sources) |
International Monetary Fund, |
"Direction of Trade of Statistics", "International Financial Statistics", "Interim World Economic Outlook December 1998", |
Bank for International Settlements, | "Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Derivatives Market Activity in April 1998", "International Banking and Financial Market Development", |
|
United Nations, "Demographic Year Book", Data provided by Economic Planing Agency, etc. |
(III-1-(3)) Real GDP Growth ofSelected Countries and Regions
(Unit : %) |
1980-1989 Average |
1990-1995 Average |
1996 |
1997 |
1998P |
1999P |
|
Japan |
3.8 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
1.4 |
- 2.8 |
- 0.5 |
NIES |
7.8 |
7.0 |
6.3 |
6.0 |
- 2.6 |
0.5 |
Asia |
7.0 |
8.3 |
8.2 |
6.6 |
2.6 |
4.3 |
United States |
2.7 |
1.8 |
3.4 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
1.8 |
Canada |
2.9 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
3.8 |
2.8 |
2.2 |
Central and South America |
2.2 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
5.1 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
EU 15 |
2.3 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.2 |
Euro 11 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.6 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
2.4 |
Central and Eastern Europe |
- |
- 1.6 |
3.7 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
(Note 1) | "Asia" includes South Asia and excludes Japan and NIES. |
(Note 2) | For "1990-1995 Average" of Central and Eastern Europe, 1991-1995 Average is provided. |
(Note 3) | "1998P" and "1999P" are estimates. |
(Source) | International Monetary Fund, "Interim World Economic Outlook, 1998 December" |
(III-2) Japan's Transactions withAsia, the United States, and the EU
( Unit: Billion yen) |
ASEAN4+NIEs+China |
United States |
EU |
World (100%) |
||||||||||
ASEAN4+NIEs |
Euro 11 |
||||||||||||
ASEAN4 |
|||||||||||||
Share |
Share |
Share |
Share |
Share |
Share |
||||||||
Trade (1998) |
29,588 |
34% |
22,123 |
25% |
8,143 |
9% |
24,248 |
28% |
14,419 |
17% |
10,865 |
12% |
87,299 |
Foreign Direct Investment |
1,361 |
21% |
1,118 |
17% |
699 |
11% |
2,549 |
38% |
1,345 |
20% |
839 |
13% |
6,623 |
Outstanding Medium- and |
73 |
26% |
63 |
22% |
24 |
9% |
100 |
35% |
50 |
18% |
22 |
8% |
283 |
(Note) "ASEAN4" refers to Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines.
(Sources) Data provided by the Japanese Ministry of Finance and others.
(III-3) Strengthening RegionalEconomic Ties in ASEAN
Introduction
While one of ASEAN's objectives at its inception (1967) was to promote regionaleconomic cooperation, it remained primarily focused on political and diplomatic mattersthrough the 1980s. This began to change in the 1990s as the Cold War came to end andregional economic blocs gained momentum with the unification of the European market andthe creation of NAFTA. Thus, at the 4th Summit held in January 1992, the "FrameworkAgreement on Enhancing Economic Cooperation" was signed, and serious steps were takentoward developing closer economic ties in the region.
The first initiative undertaken was the establishment of the ASEAN Free Trade Area(AFTA) which was to be developed through the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT).This was followed by various ongoing initiatives launched by the ASEAN Economic MinistersMeeting (AEM), the Finance Ministers Meeting, and other bodies. These initiatives areoutlined below. It should be noted that full information on the progress and the impact ofthese initiatives is not always available.
Note | : Principal abbreviations appearing in the table are as follows. | |
AEM | : ASEAN Economic Ministers Meeting | |
AFTA | : ASEAN Free Trade Area | |
AIA | : ASEAN Investment Area | |
AICO | : ASEAN Industrial Cooperation | |
CEPT | : Common Effective Preferential Tariff | |
SEOM | : Senior Economic Officials Meeting |
Area of Action |
Objective |
Principal Decisions and Chronology |
|
A F T A |
C E P T |
·To maximize liberalization of intraregional trade. Note: |
·Tariffs on intra-regional trade to be reduced to 0-5%. (List of exceptions exists, but the number of exceptions is also to be reduced.) |
Customs Procedures |
·To simplify and streamline regional customs procedures as much as possible. |
·ASEAN member countries are considering, and ASEAN is negotiating on following matters: |
|
Standards and Conformance |
·To establish general principles on product standards agreeable to all member countries; to eliminate technical obstacles. |
·Product standards are to be harmonized by 2000 for priority liberalization items, and by 2005 for regulated products. |
|
A I C O |
·To strengthen regional industrial cooperation and promote horizontal specialization among member countries. |
·0-5% tariff applicable to trade between companies which satisfy such conditions as minimum 30% |
|
Area of Action |
Objective |
Principal Decisions and Chronology |
|
A I A |
·To maximize liberalization of investment from both inside and outside ASEAN. |
·Liberalize investment from both inside and outside ASEAN, granting firms equal national treatment. |
|
Macroeconomic Policies |
·To maintain sound macroeconomic policies; to share information and exchange frank opinions to prevent crisis. |
·Surveillance secretariat placed at ADB; to be transferred to the ASEAN Secretariat in the future. |
|
Currency | Settlements |
·To maximize the use of regional currencies for intra-regional trade and settlements |
·To begin on voluntary basis; mutual arrangement will be considered later. |
Supply of Liquidity |
·To create a mutual assistance system to counter short-term liquidity shortages. |
·Exchange of US dollars against the domestic currency of a requesting member state. |
|
Currency System |
·Planning stage. |
||
Dispute Settlement |
·Four stages of consultation for dispute settlement (290 days maximum): Bilateral discussion --> Third-party mediation and arbitration (e.g. international organizations) --> SEOM --> AEM. |